reference - C++ style - const T& vs T const& -

this question has answer here:

foo(const t& t);

foo(t const& t);

as far know, same. difference purely style thing. can gather former more 'old school' approach, whilst later might see more in newer books.

is there difference, superficially and/or getting down gritty detail?

is there reason choose 1 on other, besides sticking convention within code-base?

they're same. latter more consistent because const appears after thing modifies.

if const appears before end of type-specifier sequence, it's pushed end of it. simple that.

of course, english puts adjectives before modified item. of course, c++ isn't english (and not speaks english anyway).

Breidenthal